|
Newest Reviews: New Movies - Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter Old Movies - Touki Bouki: The Journey of the Hyena The Strange Affair of Uncle Harry Archives - Recap: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 , 2005, 2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012
|
Cloverfield (Matt Reeves, 2008)
A new entry in the burgeoning camcorder horror subgenre, Matt Reeves’
Cloverfield doesn’t do much to take
advantage of its once-novel approach to narrative delivery. Instead, it lamely
mashes together a monster movie plot with questionable, post-9/11 visual cues,
resulting in a movie that might feel more offensive if it were any more
effective. Spielberg’s War of the Worlds
used some of the imagery that pops up here, but channeled it into an
overpowering aura of anxiety and alienation that reflected the mood of its era.
Cloverfield is more universal in its
approach, it can be argued, but that is only because it is more generic. The
recent I Am Legend certainly got
better usage out of the Manhattan cityscape. Here, despite a plot that follows a
group of young hipsters hiking by foot to a handful of landmarks, the city feels
bizarrely anonymous. Reeves seems to use this particular city at this particular
time not to make any rhetorical point, but only because he lacks the imagination
to come up with something that he hasn’t already glimpsed on the news or in a
better film.
The Blair Witch Project
and Diary of the Dead proved that
this handheld format is completely viable and sustainable in feature length
horror films, but it’s difficult to even consider
Cloverfield a horror film, since in
its action scenes, it’s far more concerned with spectacle than suspense. The
second half features plenty of moments where people flee through city streets,
but even those bits are so subsidiary to the half-baked character interactions
that the movie is probably best considered a mumblecore relationship drama first
and foremost. On those terms, which are just about the only terms by which one
could judge it for twenty minutes or so, it’s abysmal. The cast of self-absorbed
young hipsters vapidly chronicle their own, thankfully short, lives.
Once the film begins to indulge in monster movie conventions, it scarcely
improves. Never for a moment does it achieve any kind of you-are-there
verisimilitude. It is too badly constructed and too chock full of implausible
character motivations to pull you in. The sitcom-ready cast and hokey effects
conspire to undercut any tension or wonderment. The monster itself is nothing to
speak of. It seems to have been designed to actively evade any subtextual
interpretations. It simply exists, like everything in
Cloverfield, as empty spectacle.
Ultimately a feature-length tease, the movie remarkably insubstantial and
uninvolving for something that tries so desperately to live in the moment. The
most disturbing thing about it, in fact, is the way that it suggests that a
large portion of the population (and the creative community) simply processed
the 9/11 attacks as yet another demonstration of movie magic. 38 Jeremy Heilman
01.20.08 |