|
Newest Reviews: New Movies - Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter Old Movies - Touki Bouki: The Journey of the Hyena The Strange Affair of Uncle Harry Archives - Recap: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 , 2005, 2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012
|
The Aerial (Esteban Sapir, 2007)
Both less inventive and less substantial than it seems to think it is, Esteban
Sapir’s Argentinean, sci-fi, would-be epic
The Aerial actually suffers from the
comparisons it prompts as it tries to reference a series of silent classics.
Featuring a retro conception of the future that seems borrowed from better films
like Brazil or
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow,
the movie is not set in the silent era, despite the fact that it’s a silent
film. In fact, the plot actually centers on a nefarious scheme involving
television broadcasting used to brainwash and silence the masses. The story,
which never gains any urgency despite rampant cross-cutting, verges on kitsch,
and almost seems more suited for an animated film than a live action feature, no
matter how stylized an exercise this might be. The wildly exaggerated
performances never click, and always feel a bit amateurish. The political
undercurrents are facile, never evolving beyond the surface level. Ultimately,
there’s not much here beyond empty technique and shallow allusion (several black
and white classics, such as George Melies’
Voyage to the Moon and
Citizen Kane are given explicit
visual nods).
There have been several wholly successful silent movies made in homage over the
last few years. Rolf de Heer’s Dr. Plonk,
Andrew Leman’s The Call of Cthulhu,
and the work of Guy Maddin all come to mind. Unlike most of these movies,
though, The Aerial uses a
considerable amount of digital trickery to spice up its images. Although this
allows the filmmakers to invent some neat effects, such as the imposition of the
words that the characters speak as actual physical objects in their world, there
seems something a tad undisciplined about using newfangled technology (or the
widescreen frame, for that matter) in this kind of deliberate throwback. There’s
little rigor in Sapir’s scattershot approach, cheapening the viewing experience
considerably. Admittedly, some moments of imagination make their way to the
screen, as do some noteworthy cinematographic flourishes. For example, one
supporting character is a creepy looking boy without eyes and his mother gets a
lively musical sequence or two, but those seem small rewards for viewers, given
the potential of this sort of thing. One must also concede that at times Sapir
manages to convey an impressive sense of scale, especially if one considers the
relatively low-budget roots of the film. At the same time, considering those
financial roots of the project seems to be making excuses for what is a
fundamentally overambitious and underdeveloped work.
41
Jeremy Heilman
01.15.08 |