Bad Education (Pedro Almodovar, 2004)
It’s ironic that the last image that
Pedro Almodovar’s Bad Education offers
us is a close-up of the Spanish word “pasión”, because the film feels far
too rarefied and precise for its own good. A twisting tale of romantic obsession
and fractured psyches, Bad Education is
so fraught with meaning and substance that watching it is something of a chore,
even when it tries its hardest to be sensuous. Like a straight man looking at a
drag queen, any erotic stirrings that might crop up while watching the film is
filtered through a layer of denial. One of the numerous valid interpretations of
the title of this film about movie going and movie making would be to draw the
conclusion that films are a bad education for life, but the “real” world
here, which is made quite separate from the filmed one, is itself such an inane
and contrived conception that Bad
Education never feels grounded in emotional territory that’s in any way
familiar. It operates exactly as the movies have taught us, and it essentially
confirms its own movie-ness. For Almodovar’s ambitious, and even impressive,
layering of realities to have any effect on his audience, who view films in a
very different light, he needs to do better than this in blending his theory and
practice.
Bad Education is not so much a film about how we, the audience, experience
films as it’s about how the characters in this particular film experience
cinema. Such a distinction might sound like nitpicking, but it’s a crucial
difference that leaves Bad Education a
cold, overly analytical exercise. Almodovar acts the drama queen here, but he
strives for self-awareness at the same time, and it honestly feels that he
can’t have it both ways. On a scene by scene basis, his histrionics might
work, but the mind-numbing series of parallels that he subjects us to has a
deadening effect. It’s impossible to get caught up in the moment when you’re
reflecting on the other moments that you’ve seen up until that point. This
schematic approach is Almodovar’s mode of choice of late. He’s always trying
to paint us into a corner morally by manipulating our responses and withholding
information from us. An extended sequence in Bad
Education in which we see transvestite Gael Garcia Bernal acting out a role
in an imagined movie, is the worst example of this to date. When, we later find
out that Garcia Bernal is an impostor in this role, and when we find that the
director imagining the film suspected this all along, the lack of discordance in
his casting in this sequence becomes a major sticking point. It feels wrong
because it didn’t feel more wrong when you saw it play out. For all of
Almodovar’s striking exactitude, he can’t make the film hit you on a gut
level. Everything feels so thoroughly processed here that character motivations
become blurry, essentially crippling the film as a genre piece.
Surely, the film noir genre, where
nothing is quite as it appears, is theoretically ideal for Almodavar, who
utilizes transvestites and temporarily confusing flashbacks with equal aplomb
here. Still, the film stumbles whenever it tries to approximate the crushing
anxiety that is the touchstone of any memorable noir work. Bad
Education’s third act in
particular plods along, presumably trying to intensify complicated emotions
after a predictable, Vertigo-inspired
twist has been revealed, but Almodovar can’t even begin to pay the debt that
invoking Hitchcock carries. His revelations aren’t a sucker-punch to our
beliefs. They generally confirm what we have suspected from the first frame.
Most classic noir works at least allow us to think temporarily that there’s at
least a veneer of normalcy that’s been fractured by the cruel world in which
the film takes place, but from the opening frames of Bad Education, we’re clearly immersed in an alternative space,
where we would fully expect appearances to be deceptive. As a result, it’s not
at all surprising or effective for us to think less of the characters we like
immediately and find redemption in those who we might initially abhor. After a
while of this bait and switch, Almodovar’s endless compassion toward his
characters feels like an obligatory case of a filmmaker who’s too sure he’s
dotting all of his “i”s and crossing all of his “t”s. Ultimately, each
of this film’s exquisitely
articulated, but coolly dispatched themes achieves the same deadening effect.
Though intellectually Bad Education is
more than satisfying, true passion seems to be completely out of its grasp.
56
Jeremy Heilman
11-29-04