Newest Reviews:

New Movies -  

The Tunnel


The Tall Man

Mama Africa





Brownian Movement

Last Ride

[Rec]ł: Genesis

Hara-Kiri: Death of a Samurai

Indie Game: The Movie

Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

Old Movies -

Touki Bouki: The Journey of the Hyena

Drums Along the Mohawk

The Chase

The Heiress

Show People

The Strange Affair of Uncle Harry



Miracle Mile

The Great Flamarion

Dark Habits

Archives -

Recap: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 , 2005, 2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012

All reviews alphabetically

All reviews by star rating

All reviews by release year


Screening Log



E-mail me




Aileen: Life and Death of a Serial Killer (Nick Broomfield & Joan Churchill, 2003)


    In Aileen: Life and Death of a Serial Killer, Nick Broomfield’s follow-up to his 1992 feature Aileen Wuornos: The Selling of a Serial Killer, the documentarian attempts to provide some closure to the myriad unanswered questions that remained at the end of his previous examination of the infamous female Floridian serial killer’s treatment by the justice system. Instead he only proves that oftentimes the more you look at an event, the less you ultimately know about it. As the film begins, Broomfield is subpoenaed to testify in one of Wuornos’ appeals, in which the competence of her original trial lawyer in being questioned. Essentially in the hot seat because of his previous film’s questionable editing techniques, Broomfield uses his reintroduction to his subject as an opportunity to make another film about her. Though he begins to doubt the theories about her case that he’d previously implied, the treatment immediately poses the question as to whether or not he would have offered this apologia or second-guessed his wild assertions from the first film if he never got called back to testify.


    Though Broomfield’s first film painted a picture of a thoroughly corrupt society with Wuornos as a possible martyr of a deeply flawed legal system, this time out the attitude is less ambivalent toward her. Convicted of seven murders, this ex-prostitute faces multiple death sentences and spends most of her time in interviews making wild claims about conspiracies and contradicting what she’s previously said. When, in an apparent bout of born-again religious fervor, she voices concern for the families of her victims and confesses to the pre-meditation of each of the crimes that she committed. Broomfield is thrown for a loop and forced to reexamine many of the allegations he leveled in the first film. This new Aileen’s function as a corrective for the harm Selling might have caused provides many of its most insightful and seemingly honest moments. There seems to be a genuine quest for truth in Broomfield after he has his bubble burst, and his attitude toward Wuornos changes noticeably, even though she later refuses to confess to premeditation again. Still, it’s tough though to forget her chilling confession in which she admits to lying in an attempt to beat the system or her desperate reasoning behind her own desire for her execution in which she tells the filmmaker, “Nick, you have to kill Aileen Wuornos because she will kill again.”


    It’s his uncertainty about how to understand Wuornos that seems to prompt Broomfield to look at her past. As he investigates a life filled with homelessness, drug use, and prostitution, she becomes more sympathetic than in any of her interviews. Before she herself seems to come to the conclusion that she’s, at least on some levels, a victim of a society, Broomfield manages to make a convincing argument to the same effect. This approach is fascinating, but problems in it become apparent. The film presents an unabashedly biased point of view, but never allows many of those who would disagree with what’s being said a chance to speak. Worse still, Broomfield frequently seems as willing as his subject to indulge in conspiracy theories and there often exists the queasy hunch that his interest in her feeds her sickness. Though the disturbing final interview in Aileen: Life and Death of a Serial Killer suggests a clear-cut case of madness in its subject, Broomfield’s heavily slanted perspective makes even that gut feeling feels questionable.


* * 1/2 


Jeremy Heilman