West African director Abderrahmane Sissako’s Waiting
for Happiness uses the contested national backbone of modern Mauritania to
illustrate greater concerns about globalization and cultural homogenization.
That small nation, which gained its independence from French West Africa in
1960, used to be perched between Gallic political rule and Muslim tradition.
Apparently, though, current global economic trends are pushing French culture,
along with the culture of the rest of the free world, back into this country’s
simple farming and shipping culture, and if Sissako’s film is anything to
judge by, it’s taking its toll. Things appear placid at first. Our first view
of the town emerges almost mystically through a sandstorm, suggesting that the
settlement is somehow still part of the natural world. By the end of the movie,
when the images recede back into that veil of sand, we’re not so sure that
such a bond still exists. The final image of the film explicitly suggests a new
birth, in which one of the residents of the village emerges as a distinctly new
entity, but I found it difficult to pinpoint precisely what kind of new creature
he was supposed to be. Whether he’s become an avatar melding old traditions
with modern practices or he’s supposed to be unequivocally lost to the new
world seemed rather vague to me, and for that reason, I found it difficult to
ascertain exactly what Sissako’s view on the changes in the country was.
My gut tells me that we’re supposed to see a melding of
cultures there, since much of the rest of the film is delivered without much
evidence of a clear position. Waiting for
Happiness seems to inertly observe what it feels are inevitable changes to
its environment. Such resolute resignation to things initially feels simplistic,
but eventually a little sadness emerges from the stance. It’s as if Sissako
feels that to try to combat such a supposed global menace is useless. The best
he seems able to do is hold out some hope that shreds of what was might remain
in the future. It’s an odd viewpoint for such an overtly political film to
have, and as such much of the viewer’s time will be spent trying to grasp the
film’s attitude, and once the audience figures out what’s being said, the
filmmaker’s relative passivity will make it tough for them to really care. The
pretty images (there are several lovely shots where it’s almost impossible to
discern the sea from the shore) and the mildly amusing scenes that take place
between the locals (how many Africans does it take to change a light bulb?) stir
interest momentarily, but the movie lacks a compelling narrative motivator.