After a left-field dream sequence, Moonlight Mile,
Brad Silberling’s facile new film about loss and grieving, opens surprisingly
with a glib little sequence as its three leads - Jake Gyllenhaal, Dustin Hoffman,
and Susan Sarandon - prepare for a funeral. The abnormally well-adjusted
characters seem less distraught than usual, considering most other films that
would show such a scene would focus on the understandable histrionics before the
event. Admittedly, three days have passed since the tragedy (she was murdered),
but you would be hard pressed to deny that it was three years. The admirable
attempt of the film, which feels alternately intensely personal and crassly
populist and manipulative, is to show us the scenes that we usually don’t see
in films about mourning. To discover the ugly details that lie behind the
idealizations of a departed one, the film argues, is to step closer to the
truth. As a result, we don’t ever really get to know the girl who was lost
(she shows up only as an idealization in a dream sequence or two), we don’t
get to see any outbursts of emotion for a good portion of the running time, and
we end up bored to death as we’re faced with the reasons why we don’t watch
films about the things we don’t see in other films: they’re boring. If
scenes showing projectile dog vomit and real estate transactions are honestly
more interesting than the subject at hand, I can’t see why. If guilt manifests
itself even in the mundane, does the approach to demonstrate that thought need
to be mundane too?
Since Silberling withholds as much information as he does
in Moonlight Mile, he doesn’t come any closer to the truth than if he
had set hankies in motion with the most melodramatic scenario possible. The film
becomes a manipulation of a different, more insidious sort, offering only
vaguely appropriate pop songs where we should see true connection with its
characters. It carries its head highly, as if it’s offering us some greater,
more realistic portrait of its characters, and in doing so provoked a sharp
negative reaction in this viewer, since such a stance seems smug, especially
when recent films like In the Bedroom didn’t need to resort to such
cheap tactics to achieve their affect. The moment we realize that we’re not
going to see a big breakdown, the film sets itself up as a countdown until one
happens. When it finally comes, it conveniently sets in motion a chain of
revelations that destroy any obstacle that might keep new romance from blooming.
If we had some early, normal catharsis early on (even an outraged one), the film
wouldn’t have had to work so hard to achieve any honesty, since it would
already have been in the bag. Many (probably those who don’t realize that the
family’s name rhymes with “loss”) will be taken in by Silberling’s
approach here - Silberling’s somber approach certainly worked for me in his
similarly elegiac City of Angels - but this time out I felt the gears
churning underneath, and no amount of A-list actors, comforting yellow lighting
schemes, or studied distance from its characters could make the film work for
me. Aside from a few scattered effective grace notes, Moonlight misses by
a mile.