Dracula: Pages From a Virgin's Diary (Guy Maddin) 2002
For its scant 75-minute running time, Guy Maddin’s oddly
surreal ballet film Dracula: Pages From a Virgin's Diary transports the
viewer into an alternate cinematic world where silent melodramas are still
thriving. It's a cult classic waiting to happen. Despite the dancing, Maddin gives us what’s actually a fairly
faithful adaptation of the Bram Stoker novel in incident, if not tone. Though
the Count has a suitably prominent role, the greatest terror seems at first to
emanate not from his status as one of the undead, but instead from his status as
an Eastern European immigrant. In the opening moments of the film, as the Count
journeys to London, the intertitles panic, “Others from other lands!” and
“From the east!” As a trickle of blood moves across a map, Indiana
Jones-style to illustrate Dracula’s progress, though, the movie settles on
another form of anxiety. When the intertitles shout “Coming!” they suddenly
shift the focus of the movie onto the repressed sexuality of the virginal young
Lucy. Suddenly the Count’s foreign roots (stressed by the casting of an Asian
man in the role) make him seem wildly exotic when compared to Lucy’s three
strapping suitors.
The first movement of Dracula explores Lucy’s
corruption and eventual slide into the dark side with style. Maddin revels in
the repressed Victorian sexuality and melodrama inherent in the story. Set to
Mahler’s first two symphonies, the score underscores and exaggerates these
themes. The ballet itself is relatively expressive, I suppose, but I don’t
feel justified to really judge the dancing. The moment that had the most impact
to my untrained eyes was a comic one when the vampiric Lucy tiptoed hurriedly
backward after Van Helsing whips a cross out. Maddin seems rather uninterested
in the dance anyway, and half the time he pumps enough fog into his sets that
you can barely see the dancers’ feet. Most of the audience’s connection with
the dancers comes not from their expressive movements, but instead from the
frequent close-ups that Maddin employs. Perhaps the most impressive thing though
about the integration of the ballet is how easy it is to accept it though.
Maddin creates an environment where the theatrical nature of the ballet only
adds to the atmosphere. Nearly everything conspires to distance the viewer a
little bit from the action, so we get to a place where the audience questioning
the film’s reality. The movie’s shot in black and white (with vivid flashes
of color, especially whenever crimson blood flows), and has no spoken dialogue
(to call it a silent film is a misnomer – there are frequent and conspicuous
sound effects). There’s Vaseline smeared on the lens to create a dreamy
atmosphere and the set design recalls German expressionism with nary a right
angle in sight. The cumulative effect of these small elements makes the audience
willing to accept nearly anything that Maddin throws at them.
Maddin only occasionally betrays that trust. The
hyperkinetic style of filmmaking that Maddin employs might confound some. While
I admit freely that it’s an acquired taste, I didn’t mind much when it
allowed him to integrate a Heart of the World-style summation of Jonathan
Harker’s back-story. This sort of narrative compression keeps things focused
on the ballet and is infinitely preferable to the expository scenes that
featured Keanu Reeves in Coppola’s adaptation of the novel. A more dubious
decision by the director is his frequent infusion of irreverent humor into the
story. Admittedly, there is something inherently hilarious about the sexual and
religious hang-ups in the source material, but Maddin might overplay it. He
turns the novel’s spiritual overtones into a massive joke, and while might not
be the most enlightening treatment possible, it’s probably the most
entertaining. Maddin presents the carnal impulses of his characters
as something grotesque which makes it tough to take any of the characters seriously,
since you don’t get the impression that he really does. Instead of a frenzied
madness that springs about due to their repression, the characters often
feel as if their lunacy is only there because the movie wants them to be weirder.
Mina’s downright randy and
Van Helsing is a lecherous old pervert (the last shot shows him sniffing some
stolen panties). Just because the director is as interested in sending this
material up as adhering faithfully to it is no reason to stay away, however.
There’s as much imagination in this 75 minutes as in any previous vampire
film, and several shots have a giddying effect (my personal favorite was the
gruesome shadow play of Lucy the vampire gobbling up an infant). Maddin’s Dracula
will entrance you with its first few flickering frames and then hold you
there spellbound until its climatic dance of death.