|
Newest Reviews: New Movies - Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter Old Movies - Touki Bouki: The Journey of the Hyena The Strange Affair of Uncle Harry Archives - Recap: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 , 2005, 2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012
|
Little Otik (Jan Svankmajer) 2001 It’s somewhat ironic that Jan Svankmajer’s Little
Otik should be released in the United States on the same day as Peter
Jackson’s megabudget spectacle The Lord
of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Rings, since this scary fairy tale’s
plot, which shows a family as they rear a monster of a child, evokes Jackson’s
gory masterpiece Dead Alive more than
any other film. In Jackson’s film, there were several hilarious scenes where
the protagonist attempted to integrate his zombie baby into the rest of society,
treating the monster as if it were a normal child, and one of the best images
from that film – a cartoonish, rollicking baby carriage – is repeated here.
Svankmajer’s film has its own flavor, however, and instead of a zombie child
Karel and Bozena, the film’s protagonists, raise a tree root carved to look
like a baby. The film is a modern day recreation of, Otesanek, a
familiar Czech folk tale, so it’s only quibbling to wonder what makes Karel
think that presenting his infertile and depressed wife with a wooden baby would
be a good idea. That she takes to it and begins to treat it like a real child is
unexpected, even to Karel, and many of the film’s events feel less like they
make any psychological sense and more like they’re simply fulfilling the
prophecy created by their folklore. It’s notable that Karel is aware of the
folk tale, yet chooses to dig up the child anyway, since a lot of the film’s
energy is spent pointing out how we ignore our creation myths and hide ourselves
from truth in our newspapers, work, school, and television. There are many
scenes in which authority figures (doctors, parents, husbands) attempt to debunk
the presence of the mythic Otik without actually investigating his existence.
Alzbetka, a little girl who lives in the apartment next door to Otik, is
consistently told that it’s inappropriate that she wants to read about sex or
quote the carnage in the news, even though those same things are literally to be
found next door. That her parents practically push her into the arms of a
neighboring pedophile every time he shows up shows how clueless Svankmajer
thinks they are. It makes a good deal of sense that a director who makes
animated films skewed toward an adult perspective would be interested in telling
us that the things we deem as childish actually could enlighten us. Still, Svankmajer spends so much time justifying his work
with the validation of folklore that it pushes the film’s running time past
two hours, which is more than the film’s threadbare premise can really bear.
It’s somewhat detrimental to the whole in almost any film when the director
feels it is necessary to begin validating his film like this, and for a
filmmaker with as consistently unique a vision as Svankmajer to do that is quite
discouraging. His thesis, which basically states that we’re using our modern
day’s societal trappings to block out the primal truths about ourselves, feels
somewhat self-serving and redundant. Obviously his audience, which will be
willingly subjecting themselves to both a folk tale and a partially animated
film, will already understand that both can be enlightening for adults. Since
folklore, by its very nature, adapts itself to our modern times it’s going to
always be relevant. Little Otik,
despite being at times an enjoyably absurd bit of Grand Guignol, often simply
underlines the obvious. *** 12-20-01 Jeremy Heilman
|