|
Newest Reviews: New Movies - Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter Old Movies - Touki Bouki: The Journey of the Hyena The Strange Affair of Uncle Harry Archives - Recap: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 , 2005, 2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012
|
Kandahar (Mohsen Makhmalbaf) 2001 Thanks to real world events that have occurred since its
production, Mohsen Makhmalbaf’s Kandahar, obviously set in Afghanistan, marks
the clear arrival of the year’s most politically “important” film. The
real horror though is that most American audiences probably would have calmly
shrugged off the atrocities in it had it not been for the September 11th
terrorist attacks. The film is strong enough to stand without the piquancy of
current headlines, however, and it’s not surprising that it was being shown in
North America before the attacks occurred. Though its commercial potential has
undoubtedly increased, the film is about as far as possible from an exploitation
of tragedy. Like many films of the Iranian new wave, it has an apparent paucity
of narrative event, but a symbolic depth that few movies from other countries
can match. In the film, one is never certain whether a scene has been
scripted or not, many of the film’s scenes have been redubbed, suggesting the
environment was not conducive to sound recording, and most of the actors are
obviously nonprofessional. As a result, the viewer loses their ability to shield
themselves from the inhumanity on display in the film. We can never assure
ourselves that the film is a work of fiction. American viewers have grown used
to either an ironic or melodramatic distance in films that is completely absent
here. The world presented is so without artifice that it disarms. Every scene is
established as a functioning piece of the world before the main character shows
up, lending an air of authenticity. Though many Iranian films have blurred the
line between narrative and documentary, few use the device so unnervingly. This isn’t to suggest that Makhmalbaf works in a strictly
verite style, though. His film astonishes since it is alternatively grounded in
reality and detached from it. The plot follows a woman as she travels across
Afghanistan to reach her sister, but we never see a world outside the country to
present an alternative. Afghanistan, in the picture’s mind, is a nightmare
that after it ends is revealed to have been reality all along. Makhmalbaf drives
this feeling home with his use of the film’s imagery. When we see a scene
early on that shows a group of legless men on crutches running across the desert
toward a helicopter that is dropping what appear to be legs, it feels like an
absurdist fantasy. When that image is repeated later on, it is a grim example of
the reality of this world. The myriad technical imperfections of in the film do
indeed distract us from the plot, but that’s really so that the plot is more
effective. Clearly, Makhmalbaf demonstrates elsewhere in this film, and in his
other works that he is quite capable of using his technical skills to achieve a
desired effect. Perhaps, the best example of this is the scene in which he shows
a group of burqa-covered women as they are searched by another covered woman –
none of them look human in that situation. That the director is able to allow
technical imperfections to influence his work shows an exceptionally high level
of skill. That he places that skill behind such a neglected and worthy plight is
downright humanitarian. **** 11-27-01 Jeremy Heilman
|