|
Newest Reviews: New Movies - Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter Old Movies - Touki Bouki: The Journey of the Hyena The Strange Affair of Uncle Harry Archives - Recap: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 , 2005, 2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012
|
The Mirror (Jafar Panahi) 1998 / The Circle (Jafar
Panahi) 2001 Though he’s clearly no Makhamlbaf or Kiarostami, director
Jafar Panahi’s work appears to be some of Iran’s most ambitious. His two
most recent films to receive American distribution, The Mirror and The
Circle show that, despite his ambition, he is not the most consistently
successful of the country’s auteurs. The Mirror, which is the tries for
more and succeeds at less than The Circle, is the earlier of the two
films. It follows a young Iranian girl as she attempts to get home alone from
school after her mother fails to pick her up at the end of the day. The film is
the same sort of narratively minimalist, child-focused tale as the Iranian films
Children of Heaven or Panahi’s debut The White Balloon, and for
the first half of the picture, the focus seems to be on showing us the country
and its people from a naïve perspective. This is relatively effective, but not
for a moment does the presence of a child guide make it feel like anything less
than a political film. This is especially compounded by the presence of
characters such as an elderly woman on a bus who complains about the treatment
of elders in the nation, and the repeated times the film raises the issue of
sexual segregation. After about forty minutes of this, the film does something
radical. Mina, the young actress that has been playing the little girl suddenly
removes the cast that has adorned her arm as well as her sari, and says that she
doesn’t “want to act any more.” A boom mike swings into the picture as the
film’s faked reality shatters. Suddenly, she begins sulking and says she wants
to return home to attend a birthday party. Panahi seems to be suggesting that
even though the film seems to be no longer fictional, the facts haven’t
changed much. Unfortunately, this ploy’s execution doesn’t live up to the
brilliance of its initially jarring unveiling. At the moment when the fourth
wall breaks, the film stock changes to one that hasn’t been color corrected.
After a long, singular shot in with this more realistic feeling stock, however,
the film returns to its original look. A handheld camera replaces the more
formalistic compositions of the first half as the crew scrambles after Mira (who
is still wearing a microphone), but the shift in color dulls the feeling that
reality is being presented. The charade becomes somewhat useless because of
this, and much of the film’s second half feels more like a repetition of the
first instead of the validation of it that it wants to be. Panahi’s The Circle is not as fundamentally flawed
as The Mirror, but that might because it never attempts such astounding
narrative leaps. The film, like Richard Linklater’s Slacker, shows a
series of stories that flow into each other as the characters in them pass by
each other. The theme here examines the limited rights that Iranian women have,
and thankfully Panahi doesn’t filter his message through a child’s
perspective this time. The circle that the title refers to is the loop that
casts imprisoned women in that country in an incessant battle with the law.
After being released from jail, it is only a matter of time before they end up
in prison again, since they are not permitted to travel or seek employment
without a man’s permission. What’s more galling is that their crimes are as
petty as smoking in public. The director’s style is consistent with his theme. He
uses tracking shots to physically connect his characters to one another and
circular pans to visually illustrate his thesis. The film’s main problem lies
within that thesis itself. Since it only explores a small segment of the female
Iranian population, its attempts to define the entire nation’s female
experience in the country feel too comprehensive for their own good. The film
seems to shoehorn its characters stories into its metaphor instead of making
their plight seem to naturally flow into one. In both cases, if Panahi was not
so obsessed with being all-encompassing in his storytelling, he might be a much
better filmmaker. Still, both of
these films are prime examples noble filmic failures. It’s almost always far
better to see a director stumble when attempting to show a political plight or
trying to reinvent the form than when making a facile, sentimental work, and
it’s representative of the country’s strong cinema that an innovator like
Panahi does not quite embody the cutting edge of Iranian cinema. The Mirror *** The Circle ***1/2 12/02/01 Jeremy Heilman
|