|
Newest Reviews: New Movies - Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter Old Movies - Touki Bouki: The Journey of the Hyena The Strange Affair of Uncle Harry Archives - Recap: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 , 2005, 2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012
|
The Unbelievable Truth (Hal Hartley) 1990
Perhaps the most unbelievable thing about The
Unbelievable Truth is that Hal Hartley’s aesthetic, used to ironically
deliver his stone-faced philosophy, arrives in this talky comedy, his first
feature, fully formed. Even if this very solid film doesn’t quite attain the
thematic cohesiveness of Hartley’s later Trust
or Henry Fool, it is a heck of a start, even considering Hartley has
remained one of the best contemporary American screenwriters over the last
decade. Hartley often gets a bum rap for his direction of actors, which tends to
rely on them creating a disaffected, ironic distance from the material, but I
don’t think the stuff that Hartley writes would work if delivered with
histrionics. The laissez faire attitude that prevails here allows his wild plot
twists to feel as if they were inevitable and expected. Hartley’s a master of understatement, and the film’s
muted tone belies the power of his films to be completely unpredictable, even as
it stands in opposition to the emotional vociferousness that his movie might
provoke in the viewer. In Truth,
Hartley uses the film’s middle-class Long Island setting as a springboard to
attack the mores of the bourgeoisie. Chief among his social concerns are the
social and financial competitiveness between people, the desire to step out of
the life that one is born into (and the compromises necessary to do so), and the
need to impose conformity upon each other. This description makes the film sound
far more didactic than the movie is however, and there are few, if any, moments
that truly feel preachy. The way that Harley generally promotes his views is
through conversation, not monologue, so the film rarely feels pretentious. This communal restlessness imbues the film with a sense
that no one’s quite happy with things, even if they aren’t exactly miserable
either. Audry (the superb Adrienne Shelly), the film’s moody and alienated
teen protagonist seems to latch onto her fascination with nuclear apocalypse
mostly because she doesn’t have any better way to express her dissatisfaction
with the predictability of her life. The prospect of college is staring her
down, but she is rather apathetic toward the notion of undergoing further
conditioning, even if an Ivy League school administers it. The way the film
drolly explains her point of view seems to be at odds with the sentiment at the
film’s core, until you realize there’s a frustration with a society that
settles for quirkiness instead of asking for more. When Audry makes her Faustian
deals with her father, we realize that despite the cuteness of the situation,
Hartley makes it clear that her principles, and maybe even her individualized
soul, are at stake. * * * * Jeremy Heilman 01-02-02
|